Sunday, November 28th, 2010 | Author:
4439297284 ec450e8b5d m How to compare Health Insurance Policies?

States with Republican governors kept up the pressure last week on Washington to give the states greater control over health care under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Twenty-one Republican governors sent a letter to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius asking for greater authority over some provisions of health reform, including the ability to define “essential” health benefits and set minimum criteria for participating in insurance exchanges. They threatened not to run their own state-based exchanges if HHS does not act on their requests. Sebelius quickly responded with her own letter in which she reviewed the various options states have to reduce costs in their Medicaid programs, and she indicated she is continuing to review what authority she may have to “waive the maintenance of effort under current law.” Senate bills have already been introduced to address the role of the states in health care reform, which is sure to keep the issue on the front burner. Visit Easy To Insure ME for more info

Federal

The House Committee on Ways & Means held a hearing last week on “The Health Care Law’s Impact on Medicare and Its Beneficiaries,” featuring testimony from CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, M.D., and CMS Chief Actuary Richard Foster. Berwick testified that the PPACA has had a positive impact on Medicare beneficiaries, noting that beneficiaries now have first-dollar coverage of key preventive benefits, additional assistance with prescription drug costs, and an annual wellness visit with the physician of their choice. In response to concerns noted by several committee members about the impact of funding cuts on Medicare Advantage, Berwick indicated that Medicare Advantage enrollment increased by 6 percent from 2010 to 2011. He suggested that the program is healthy and offers robust choices. Foster’s testimony reiterated his prior projection that the PPACA will cause Medicare Advantage enrollment to decline by about 50 percent by 2017 — from a projected 14.5 million under the pre-PPACA law to 7.3 million under the new law.  His testimony further explained that Medicare Advantage enrollees will experience “a large increase in out-of-pocket costs” and “less generous benefit packages” because PPACA will reduce rebates to Medicare Advantage plans, with the reduction in rebates reaching $1,500 per beneficiary by 2019.

The Administration last week issued favorable guidance with respect to student health coverage that will result in little disruption, if any, to this business until at least the 2012-2013 academic year. This guidance was announced in a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (rather than as an interim final regulation), which fortunately means that the rule is not effective immediately as has been the case with most regulations relating to PPACA reforms. The proposed student health rule would create a special class of individual coverage for student health pursuant to a set of factors, e.g., written contract between school and insurer, coverage only for students and dependents, health status may not be used as a condition of eligibility.  As Aetna has advocated, the impact would be delayed, as the rule (whenever finalized) would not be effective until policy years beginning on or after January 2012. Until then, student health is not subject to PPACA reforms.  And, when effective, student health would be excepted from the current guaranteed issue and renewability provisions of PPACA.  While it will be unclear for a while whether and how student health will be subject to the medical loss ratio (MLR) provisions of PPACA, we are encouraged by the fact that the proposed rule invites comments on whether student health should receive some sort of special accommodation (akin to the special rule for limited benefit plans) with respect to MLR, owing to the unique characteristics of the student health market.

States

ARIZONA:  The industry-supported exchange bill was introduced last week under the sponsorship of the House Health Committee Chairman and the respective chairmen of the House and Senate Banking and Insurance Committees. The bill provides for a market-based mechanism; governance by a board with insurer representation; no dual regulation; and a conditional repeal provision. The first hearing will be held this week. In other news, Governor Jan Brewer appointed Don Hughes, former AHIP retained counsel, as Special Advisor for Health Care Innovation. Hughes will help direct state efforts to improve the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of health care. He will engage in strategic planning with a focus encompassing both public health care and Arizona’s large private health insurance industry.

CONNECTICUT:  A jointly held public hearing of the Public Health and Insurance and Real Estate Committees was scheduled for this week on two new health care bills. The first bill would establish the SustiNet Plan Authority, a quasi-public agency empowered to implement a public health care option. The SustiNet Plan is a health insurance program that consists of coordinated individual health insurance plans that provide health insurance products to state employees, Medicaid enrollees, HUSKY Plan, Part A and Part B enrollees, HUSKY Plus enrollees, municipalities, municipal-related employers, nonprofit employers, small employers, other employers, and individuals in Connecticut. The Authority is authorized, but not required, to begin offering SustiNet coverage to employees and retirees of non-state public employers, municipal-related employers, small employers, and nonprofit employers after January 1, 2012.  Beginning on January 1, 2014, SustiNet will offer coverage to individuals and employers.  Among other things, the bill directs the Authority to implement primary care case management and patient-centered medical homes for all SustiNet Plan members, establish a pay-for-performance system, and establish procedures to prevent adverse selection.

]]>

The Committees also will hear testimony on a bill to establish the Connecticut Health Insurance Exchange pursuant to PPACA.  The exchange would be a quasi-public agency offering qualified health plans to individuals and qualified employers by January 1, 2014.  The bill would establish a 13-member board of directors to manage the exchange. The exchange would have the authority to review the rate of premium growth within and outside the exchange in order to develop recommendations on whether to continue limiting qualified employer status to small employers. It also would have the authority to charge assessments or user fees to health carriers to generate funding necessary to support the operations of the exchange. The bill directs the exchange board to report to the legislature by January 1, 2012 on whether to establish two separate exchanges, one for the individual market and one for the small employer market, or to establish a single exchange; whether to merge the individual and small employer health insurance markets; whether to revise the definition of “small employer” from not more than 50 employees to not more than 100; and whether to allow large employers to participate in the exchange beginning in 2017.

Aetna will submit comments on both bills through the Connecticut Association of Health Plans.

IDAHO: Draft legislation is circulating that would prohibit insurance companies and managed care organizations from refusing to contract with qualified providers solely because the provider: is not a member of a group, network or any other organization of providers contracting with the insurance company; or does not offer all of the services obtained through the group, network or organization of providers contracting with the insurance company. However, the provider may be required to comply with the practice standards and quality requirements of the contract specific to the services contracted. The bill generally is intended to impact insurers and managed care organizations. It does not contain an exclusion or exception for HIPAA-excepted benefits. As yet, the bill has not found a sponsor and has not been “introduced.”  While there remains a possibility that the bill could be introduced before the deadline for committee bill introductions, it is considered unlikely.

MINNESOTA: When the legislature convened the first half of its 2011-2012 biennium last month, Republicans controlled both legislative chambers for the first time since 1972. And, Republican lawmakers wasted little time introducing bills to repeal measures passed by the 2010 legislature to fund state medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and MinnesotaCare. In his first official act as Governor, Mark Dayton signed an executive order implementing early Medicaid expansion (to 133 percent of the federal poverty level) for Minnesota, which is expected to make 95,000 more state residents eligible. Minnesota’s $188 million investment is expected to bring about $1.2 billion in matching federal funds. Governor Dayton also signed an executive order removing the ban on applications for federal PPACA-related grants. Minnesota is expected to receive an exchange planning grant soon. While Governor Dayton cleared the way for the state to seek grants for implementing federal health reform, it is unlikely that state legislators will be passing bills to implement the federal health reform law unless absolutely necessary. Other pending bills of interest include anti-PPACA legislation, a bill requiring guaranteed issue in the individual market, creation of a defined contribution program for childless adults with incomes at or above 133 percent of FPL (reduction from current level of 250 percent), the prohibition of dental plan fee schedules for non-covered services, and an

Related Post

Pages: 1 2
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

18 Responses

  1. 1
    Rati J 

    go there

  2. 2
    gyt 

    Good thinking, But you only gave $1 per person in your argument not 100,000.00. what it should be is 4.5 billion would ensure the 45 million. but that's even still is allot cheaper than the trillion dollars our liberals want to spend?

  3. 3
    clokkerfoot 

    MATT SMITH SPEAKING!!!

  4. 4
    amyarkle10 

    The only reason I love this advert because of Matt Smith’s voice! <3<3

  5. 5
    MegaDanDrum 

    What a god awful version of the song,

  6. 6
    coulduseanewbrain 
  7. 7
    coulduseanewbrain 

    you are having so much confusion that is why your question is not clear make sure what do you want to know

  8. 8
    babbie 

    WOW. It would seem that your analogy comparing the "pre-existing condition" mandate to demanding an auto insurer to retroactively cover your car "after" the accident is totally over the heads of the respondents so far.
    Mr. Magoo (how appropriate), managed to mention almost every misleading democratic talking point verbatim. He blasts conservatives for opposing this bill and other loony ideas from this Congress, but I'll wager that he's in full support of the democrats in the past that stood in the way of any number of Republican proposals.

  9. 9
    Jacob W 

    You need to stop thinking, using facts, and making your own decisions. We have government to make up the facts, tell you what to think and make your decisions for you.

  10. 10
    Taylor 

    now i have to edit it, yay…………….

  11. 11
    AGBchattery 

    i love watchin this coz of matt smith -3

    lol if the BUPA people went on youtube and were like “YAY LOOK AT THE VIEWS” when really half the people all watch it to hear the god-like matt smith’s voice xD

  12. 12
    TheJellyMuffin 

    is it just me or does the guy at 00:46 have a boner? :/

  13. 13
    Salvation: nu.cyu.ler dis.truk.on GOP 2012 

    Thanks for pointing this out. I looked it up and found the actual Act plus some discussion. I think we should go for it!

    The Buy Into Medicare proposal nowhere compels participation in Medicare; it just allows it. If you happen to have a nicer insurance policy, you can stay with it.

    We do indeed need a public option; every other industrialized country has one. If we compel everyone to have some sort of coverage, the Medicare option would take care of those who are left out of the commercial market, especially the young and healthy. It would also take care of those who have the famous pre-existing conditions. A subsidy could help those too poor to buy in, even at the young rates. Having more participants will require slightly more administration, but there is some efficiency of scale.

    The risk is calculated for age cohorts, rather than by underwriting. That is true community rating. I don't see the actual premium amounts, though; they will be determined by the same actuaries who determine all the other Medicare rates. Still, it would be nice to have an idea.

    The administrative costs are less than for private insurance, if only because there is no reward in denying reimbursement.

    Any method that covers everyone would help with the cost of hospital treatment, for the reasons you have given. Hospitals are being hit hard for those emergency services, and services to the indigent, and noncollectable debt. Both hospitals and doctors would prefer the simplicity and effectiveness of some kind of single payer system, so long as the rates were maintained at a reasonable level. It would certainly improve the ER and its costs.

    Finally, the real cost of lousy health care is lousy health. Preventive and early care would keep more people working and active, as well as keeping them out of the ER and intensive care. It would also keep them in their homes and their kids in college.

    I can't begin to tell you how much I hate responding to health questions that should be handled by a primary care physician.

  14. 14
    Dr.T 

    You elect Democrats & have the choice removed.

  15. 15
    AnnaRoberts9 

    @amyarkle10 LOL taw Amz.. ;)

  16. 16
    TonikHealthInsurance 

    interesting videos. thanks for sharing information

  17. 17
    fishyboy2010 

    Haha my m8 is in this
    (The guy in the wig shop)

  18. 18
    amyarkle10 

    0:50 LOL the way Matt Smith says ‘bupa’ :’) Got to love him! <3<3

Leave a Reply » Log in